Clinical and Non-Clinical Testing for Medical Devices to Treat Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
This guidance addresses the general concepts for designing non-clinical and clinical investigations for medical devices intended to treat Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). It applies to both class II and class III devices, including laser surgical instruments, endoscopic electrosurgical units, thermal ablation devices, microwave hyperthermia systems, prostatic stents, and other BPH treatment technologies.
Recommended Actions
- Develop comprehensive non-clinical testing plan with predefined specifications
- Consider need for animal studies based on device novelty and risk
- Design pilot study if device is novel or represents significant technology shift
- Plan randomized, controlled pivotal study with appropriate control group
- Define clear inclusion/exclusion criteria and evaluation schedule
- Select appropriate primary endpoints (effectiveness and safety)
- Develop statistical analysis plan and sample size calculation
- Create detailed monitoring plan and case report forms
- Establish procedures to minimize missing data
- Consider need for post-approval studies for Class III devices
- Contact FDA early to discuss study design through Pre-Submission process
Key Considerations
Clinical testing
- Pilot study recommended for novel devices to assess short-term safety, treatment technique, and optimal patient population
- Pivotal study should be randomized, controlled, multi-center trial
- 1-year minimum follow-up recommended
- Primary effectiveness endpoint based on AUA-SI/IPSS improvement (≥30% over baseline)
- Primary safety endpoint based on adverse events
- Clear inclusion/exclusion criteria needed
- Detailed pre and post-treatment evaluation schedule required
Non-clinical testing
- Comprehensive testing with predefined performance limits required
- Testing should simulate mechanical stresses during use
- Evaluate device function and safety under controlled conditions
- Provides foundation for assessing future device changes
Software
- Provide information based on “Level of Concern”
- Follow FDA guidance for software in medical devices
Biocompatibility
- Testing required for all patient-contacting components
- Testing on finished devices in final form
- Evaluate impact of device storage on material safety
- Follow ISO 10993-1 standard
Safety
- Electrical safety testing per ES60601-1
- EMC testing per 60601-1-2
- MR compatibility assessment for implants
- Sterilization validation if provided sterile
- Reprocessing validation if reusable
Other considerations
- Animal studies may be needed based on device design and risk
- Statistical analysis plan must be pre-specified
- Study monitoring procedures required
- Case report forms needed to document all study data
Relevant Guidances
- Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions
- Use of ISO 10993-1 for Biological Evaluation and Testing of Medical Devices
- Electromagnetic Compatibility for Medical Devices and Accessories: Testing, Documentation, and Labeling Requirements
- Requests for Feedback and Meetings for Medical Device Submissions: The Q-Submission Program
Related references and norms
- ANSI/AAMI ES60601-1: Medical electrical equipment - Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance
- ANSI/AAMI/IEC 60601-1-2: Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral standard: Electromagnetic disturbances
- ISO 10993-1: Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process
Original guidance
- Clinical and Non-Clinical Testing for Medical Devices to Treat Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
- HTML / PDF
- Issue date: 2021-12-27
- Last changed date: 2021-12-23
- Status: FINAL
- Official FDA topics: Medical Devices, Gastroenterology-Urology, Premarket, Good Clinical Practice (GCP)
- ReguVirta summary file ID: d612e682f9fdbabc049e1ad6acef21e8
This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.